Pics of my D/D 325iS...

[Blakeoffire]

Originally Posted by k-swiss Seriously Blake try a chip in it. I'm sure it will make you a lot happier. ITs funny that your m30 makes you happier. Its even more archaic then the m20! Go figure!

Well, it (the M30) just responds so much more fluently and ably... a much more reactive (and chain driven) and smoother, quieter-running engine as well. I don't know if you've ever driven an '89 M30 with only 100,ooo KMs on the clock but if you drive mine one day (?), you'll see what I'm on about...

Seriously my friend... wheezing underpowered mule or brutish angry-sounding tidal wave of torque from your BMW I6... ?

Okay, maybe I'll chip the M20 and reevaluate...


-B.

p.s.- What did I say about no pissing yr M20'd pants in my thread...!!

[k-swiss]

I've driven m30's and m20's. I always found the m20 to be spritely and willing to please. M30 just felt like what it is. No replacement for displacement. A big tractor motor of sorts in a 5'er or a 6'er. Different strokes for different folks I guess.

[Mr. Red]

great to finally see some pictures Blake! I'm glad you're treating her right!

[bcbimmer]

Get a chip.. a big diffrence ! though you were gonna sell it and get something newer ?

[Eugene]

You can try out the Mark D. chip I have in my car and you'll feel the difference. We won't be having any m20 vs m42 conversations after that. PM me if interested.

[Blakeoffire]

Originally Posted by k-swiss I've driven m30's and m20's. I always found the m20 to be spritely and willing to please. M30 just felt like what it is. No replacement for displacement. A big tractor motor of sorts in a 5'er or a 6'er.

You really make the eyes roll into the back of my head sometimes Kirin...


There's never anything supportive, positive or even constructive coming from you whenever I post a pic/update thread or if I happen to offer my opinion of what I feel/experience about an engine/wheel/tire/suspension set-up/etc. when asked by other members. You're just always in an attack-like, defensive mode of conduct with me... So of course you set about referencing the M30 engine in my 6er as 'a big tractor motor of sorts'... ... oh gee ouch... no surprise there though.

Yes Kirin, the M20 is a fine fine engine, I stated that quite clearly (aside from the laziness I happen to experience and its sometimes questionable pick-up/delivery and soundtrack). It just (for me... can you handle this?) has pronounced characteristics about it that don't seem to set my nerves-a-tingling with excitement...that's all.


This debate is so ancient now... can't someone have an opinion on their M20 engine without you losing your shirt..?

-B.

[VitaminJ]

Hahaha, maybe I shouldn't have asked the question. But thanks for your feedback Blake..!

[k-swiss]

Blake, There is nothing at all close to attacking in my posts.

An M30 is a tractor motor. I believe they even put them into motorhomes. Thats not even a bad thing really, Big displacement and tons of torque. Also how about the fact that its been around since the 70's and is a big hulk of iron. Compared to your beloved m42 and anything post that it is archaic and the amount of power you can get from it compared to common mills isn't very exciting.

Seriously if you can't handle the flames get away from the fire. If you don't want to be judged don't post or make yourself a public presence.

You know I love both m20's and m30's. But they are old and pretty behind the times.

That being said if you truly feel that I have a grudge against you I'm more than willing to settle this via PM.

[G-rex]

Originally Posted by Eugene You can try out the Mark D. chip I have in my car and you'll feel the difference. We won't be having any m20 vs m42 conversations after that. PM me if interested.

Hey Eugene, do you know how much more gas the chip would require?

[Eugene]

Originally Posted by G-rex Hey Eugene, do you know how much more gas the chip would require?

A lot of guys say they get better economy because it optimizes the timing and fuel maps to be more efficient. I can't say if yours would increase as I drive my car with my "foot in it" more than the average person, so I am a poor example, but I didn't notice any increase in fuel consumption after the install.

The great thing about Mark D. chips is that they improve idle, part throttle, and full throttle maps, unlike Dinan which is mainly optimized for full throttle. It is rated at min octane requirement of 93 but I have run Mohawk 94, 92, and 90 with no apparent adverse effects physically or audibly.

[Eugene]

Originally Posted by Mr. Red great to finally see some pictures Blake! I'm glad you're treating her right!

+1, that is definitely a sweet ride. Come to think of it, every one that you have owned is a sweet ride!

[k-swiss]

I'm conclusive with Eugene. A chip does increase your power and can still return you good fuel economy. I was averaging around 450-515 per tank when I drove my e30 daily. Record for it though was a astonishing 615 per tank. All highway...

[G-rex]

Originally Posted by k-swiss I'm conclusive with Eugene. A chip does increase your power and can still return you good fuel economy. I was averaging around 450-515 per tank when I drove my e30 daily. Record for it though was a astonishing 615 per tank. All highway...

Did you find an increase in km's per tank with the increase octane.

[Eugene]

A stock vehicle that takes your common 87, will never see an increase in km's per tank with the increase octane. The same goes for an increase in power. Those are common statements which haven't any scientific backing behind them.

[ClassicScot]

Originally Posted by craig4ie This car makes diving boards look good!

Diving boards always look good especially when they actually shine!